1945-2025. The decivilization and dehumanization of the international community

 

Evaluating the UN as a human organization using the Rensis Lickert method (2025)

 

🔍(AI)  UN  Assessment ( 2025)

         (António Guterres - Secretary General)

 

Rensis Likert Model  

In recent decades, the UN's activity has been intensely criticized for inefficiency, bureaucracy and the departure from the organization's initial goals, one of the reasons being the status and influence of the members of the Security Council who set the tone for this evolution. Even if it is relatively limited in its scope, the Rensis Lickert method of evaluating human organization - easily applied with the help of AI-chatgbt - manages, through the 22 variables identified, to capture the evolution, or rather the involution, of this organization.  

1. Organization profile

2. Profile analysis 

                    🔍 (AI)  Organization profile analysis - UN (2025)

                                     Variables, states, characteristics

No.	Variable	ASSESSMENT	condition
1	Degree of trust in subordinates	Raised in specialized agencies	🔵Functional
2	Freedom of expression down	Limited in hierarchical structures, more open in some agencies	🟡Inefficiency
3	Freedom of expression up	Diplomatic pressures reduce real feedback on the ground	🟡Inefficiency
4	Degree of influence on decisions	Small in terms of executive staff, dominated by the great powers	🔴Blockage
5	Interest in new ideas	Present in some UN programs, but bureaucratically slow	🔵Functional
6	Decision-making process	Often political, less rational	🟡Inefficiency
7	Decision-making communication mode	Formal, cumbersome, ineffective in crises	🟡Inefficiency
8	Control mode	Too slow or formal; lack of consistent application	🟡Inefficiency
9	Using control	Rarely produces real change	🟡 Inefficiency
10	Motivation methods	Limited in internal motivation; rather symbolic	🟡Inefficiency
11	Interest in professional development	It exists, but unevenly between the arts.	🔵Functional
12	Empowering subordinates	Raised on paper, but rare real envelope	🟡Inefficiency
13	The degree of team cohesion	Variable; good in some agencies, poor at the top	🔵Functional
14	Internal conflict	Present, but diplomatically concealed	🟡Inefficiency
15	Accepting conflict	Avoided instead of managed	🟡 Inefficiency
16	Trust in leaders	Low in some regions, relatively high globally	🔵Functional
17	Leaders' visibility	High (e.g. Guterres), but low efficiency	🔵Functional
18	Coherence of objectives	Often vague, contradictory between agencies	🟡Inefficiency
19	Task clarity	Clearer in technical agencies, diffuse in leadership	🔵Functional
20	How to make strategic decisions	Geopolitically influenced, slow decision-making	🔴Blockage
21	Flexibility to change	Low at the top, higher in specialized structures	🟡Inefficiency
22	How to use the control results	Weak, rarely leads to reforms	🔴Blockage

Evaluarea ONU ca organizatie umana prin metoda Rensis Lickert (2025)

 

🔍(AI) Evaluarea ONU (2025)

         ( António Guterres - Secretar General )

 Modelul Rensis Likert  

In ultimele decenii activitatea ONU este intens criticata pentru ineficienta, birocratie  si indepartarea de la scopurile initiale ale organizatiei unul din motive fiind statutul si influenta membrilor din Consiliul de Securitate care au dat tonul acestei evolutii. Chiar daca este relativ limitata prin aria ei de cuprindere  metoda Rensis Lickert de evaluare a organizatiei umane - aplicata usor cu ajutorul AI-chatgbt - reuseste prin cele  22 de variabile identificate sa surprinda evolutia, sau mai bine spus involutia acestei organizatii.  

1. Profilul organizatiei

2. Analiza profilului 

                    🔍 (AI) Analiză profilului organizatiei - ONU (2025)

                                     Variabile, stari , caracteristici

Nr	Variabila	Evaluare	Stare
1	Gradul de incredere in subalterni	Ridicat in agentii specializate	🔵Functionala
2	Libertatea de exprimare in jos	Limitata in structurile ierarhice, mai deschisa in unele agentii	🟡Ineficienta
3	Liberatea de exprimare in sus	Presiuni diplomatice reduc feedback-ul real in teren	🟡Ineficienta
4	Gradul de influentare a deciziilor	Mic la nivel de personal executive, dominat de marile puteri	🔴Blocaj
5	Interesul pentru idei noi	Prezent in unele programe ONU, dar lent birocratic	🔵Functionala
6	Modul de luare a deciziilor	Adesea politic, mai putin rational	🟡Ineficienta
7	Modul de comunicare decizionala	Formal, greoi, ineficient in crize	🟡Ineficienta
8	Modul de control	Prea lent sau formal; lipsa de aplicare coerenta	🟡Ineficienta
9	Utilizarea controlului	Rareori produce schimbari reale	🟡Ineficienta
10	Metode de motivare	Limitate in motivatia interna ; mai degraba simbolice	🟡Ineficienta
11	Interes pentru dezvoltare profesionala	Exista, dar inegal intre deartamente	🔵Functionala
12	Responsabilizarea subordonatilor	Ridicata pe hirtie, dar rara plicata real	🟡Ineficienta
13	Gradul de coeziune al echipei	Variabil ; buna in unele agentii, slaba la varf	🔵Functionala
14	Conflictul intern	Prezent, dar disimulat diplomatic	🟡Ineficienta
15	Acceptarea conflictului	Evitat in loc sa fie gestionat	🟡Ineficienta
16	Increderea in lideri	Scazuta in unele regiuni , relative ridicta global	🔵Functionala
17	Vizibiitatea liderilor	Ridicata ( ex: Guterres) , dar eficienta redusa	🔵Functionala
18	Coerenta obiectivelor	Adesea vaga, contradictorie intre agentii	🟡Ineficienta
19	Claritatea sarcinilor	Mai clara in agentiile tehnice, difua in leadership	🔵Functionala
20	Modul de luare al deciziilor strategice	Influentat geopolitic, lentoare decizionala	🔴Blocaj
21	Flexibilitatea la schimbare	Scazuta la varf, mai mare n structure specializate	🟡Ineficienta
22	Modul de utilizare al rezultatelor controlului	Slab, rar duce la reforme	🔴Blocaj

" Sarutul fratesc" sau jungla lui Meinong in varianta 2025

 

Aceasta imagine : 

          Trebuie privita si inteleasa asa : 

https://adevarul.ro/stiri-locale/constanta/sarutul-dintre-doi-barbati-care-a-oripilat-lumea-1675167.html

Evaluarea Guvernului Romaniei (premier Marcel Ciolacu ) prin metoda Rensis Likert (2025)

 

🔍(AI) Evaluarea Guvernului Romaniei (2025 ) premier Marcel Ciolacu

Dincolo de disputele politice  si de pericolul major de la granitele Romaniei reprezentat de razboiul cumplit din Ucraina , activitatea guvernului Ciolacu poate fi evaluata in mod obiectiv cu mijloacele clasice oferite de stiintele sociale si cu mijloacele puse la dispozitie de inteligenta artificiala care are acces la informatia publica globala. Cele 22 de variabile  ale organizatiei umane propuse de Rensis Lickert (1967) ofera posibilitatea AI/chatgbt de a evalua in mod obiectiv  activitatea acestui guvern depasind scandalurile si emotiile puternice din spatiul public.

1. Profilul Guvernului Romaniei (2025)- Premier Marcel Ciolacu )  

 Modelul Rensis Likert  

2. Analiza profilului

🔍 (AI)US Analiza profilului Guvernului Romaniei (2025)

Variabile,  stari , caracteristici 

Nr	Variabilă	Stare	Evaluare
1.	Gradul de încredere în subordonați	🟡 Ineficientă	Lipsa autonomiei          instituționale și politizarea deciziilor
2.	Motivația membrilor organizației	🔴 Blocaj	Demotivare din cauza      birocrației și instabilității
3.	Interacțiunea între membri	🔵 Funcțională	Cooperare formală, dar cu disfuncționalități
4.	Fluxul de informație ascendent	🟡 Ineficientă	Limitat și filtrat politic
5.	Fluxul de informație descendent	🔵 Funcțională	Prezent, dar adesea      folosit pentru control
6.	Luarea deciziilor	🔴 Blocaj	Centralizare excesivă, lipsă de transparență
7.	Stabilirea obiectivelor	🟡 Ineficientă	Neclare sau contradictorii   în unele domenii
8.	Identificarea conflictelor	🔴 Blocaj	Neglijate sau politizate
9.	Mod de rezolvare a conflictelor	🔴 Blocaj	Se recurge rar la soluții      colaborative
10.	Participarea la luarea deciziilor	🟡 Ineficientă	Consultările publice sunt   formale
11.	Gradul de cooperare interinstituțională	🔵 Funcțională	Există colaborare, dar   fragmentată

12.	Gradul de delegare a responsabilităților	🟡 Ineficientă	Delegarea e formală, dar fără autonomie reală
13.	Autonomia în îndeplinirea sarcinilor	🔴 Blocaj	Control excesiv din partea conducerii
14.	Măsura în care se folosesc ideile subordonaților	🔴 Blocaj	Inițiativele din jos în sus sunt ignorate
15.	Claritatea canalelor de comunicare	🔵  Funcțională	Comunicare instituționalizată, dar birocratică
16.	Flexibilitatea organizației	🟡 Ineficientă	Rigiditate administrativă și rezistență la schimbare
17.	Atitudinea față de schimbare	🔴 Blocaj	Schimbările sunt mimate, nu asumate
18.	Recunoașterea performanței	🟡 Ineficientă	Evaluarea este formală, dar deseori politizată
19.	Mecanisme de control și feedback	🔵 Funcțională	Există, dar cu impact redus
20.	Tipul de lider	🟡 Ineficientă	Lider autoritar, cu puține tendințe consultative
21.	Stilul de conducere	🔴 Blocaj	Stil de comandă și control, rezistent la parteneriat
22.	Modul de folosire al rezultatelor controlului	🔴 Blocaj	Feedback-ul influențează rar deciziile strategice

( Va urma ) .

Evaluation of US leadership - President Donald Trump ( 2025 ) by the Rensis Likert method

🔍(AI) Evaluating US Leadership (2025) using the Rensis Likert Method (1967)

( President Donald Trump key figure )

The evolution of the USA has currently reached an inflection point generated by President Donald Trump, who has upset the value system of American society and openly intends to produce a categorical rupture with the previous evolution of this society of freedom, initiative and Western-style democracy.

The social fracture is evident in the abandonment of the values ​​of transparency promoted by J.F. Kennedy, the values ​​of political and social morality promoted by Ronald Reagan and the cynical return to the primitive imperialist model of past centuries.

His predecessors ( Biden, Obama, Clinton, etc. ) also had a significant role in America's decline, but Donald Trump has violated all the red lines by simultaneously resetting the status and position of the USA and, first of all, the international legal order, where he took over the baton from Russia and Putin, leaving them without an object of work.

Beyond the partisan political disputes and the strong emotions in the American public space, the evaluation of the US leadership under President Donald Trump is possible with the classical means offered by the social sciences offered by the Americans of the past. The 22 variables of human organization proposed by Rensis Lickert (1967) offer the possibility through AI/chatgbt to objectively evaluate the activity of this leadership, namely the SF catastrophe given to America by the impossible President Donald Trump.

1.Profile of the US leadership ( Donald Trump the key figure )

2. Profile analysis 

🔍 (AI)US Leadership Profile Analysis (2025)

Variables, states, characteristics 

                                 

No.	Organizational Variable	Estimated Status	Evaluation
1	Degree of trust in subordinates	Blockage /🔴 Inefficient🟡	Populism, extreme polarization
2	Managerial philosophy	Inefficient🟡	Dominated by loyalty rather than competence
3	Reward policies	Inefficient🟡	Political favoritism
4	Decision-making process	Blockage🔴	Impulsive decisions, instability
5	Vertical communication	Inefficient🟡	Distrust between leaders and institutions
6	Horizontal communication	Blockage🔴	Internal divisions between agencies
7	Goal setting	Inefficient🟡	Contradictory and incoherent objectives
8	Training and development	Blockage🔴	Underfunding and lack of institutional interest
9	Interpersonal relationships	Inefficient🟡	High tension and extreme polarization
10	Trust in leadership	Blockage🔴	Trust only within ideological inner circles
11	Employee involvement	Inefficient🟡	Low participation in administration
12	Internal motivation	Blockage🔴	Undermining institutional morale
13	Job satisfaction	Inefficient🟡	Burnout and bureaucratic conflict
14	Organizational cohesion	Blockage🔴	Fragmented institutions
15	Adaptability to change	Inefficient🟡	Resistance to reform and science
16	Role clarity	Inefficient🟡	Confusion over responsibilities and hierarchy
17	Collective decision-making	Blockage🔴	Authoritarian domination
18	Interdepartmental coordination	Blockage🔴	Conflict between agencies
19	Attitude toward feedback	Blockage 🔴	Hostility toward criticism
20	Innovation and creativity	Inefficient🟡	Politically driven, not rational
21	Performance	Inefficient🟡	Decline in democratic performance indicators
22	Use of control results	Blockage 🔴	Institutional and legislative paralysis

3. Instead of a conclusion

This leadership style boils down to:

 "Is there anything left to destroy?" 

Does anyone else see any future for the USA and President Donald Trump with this horror  leadership style ? 

You can place your bets now !

Note

The analysis of the variables, their status and evaluation was done by AI/chatgbt. The graph, respectively the graphical profile of the organization that resulted from this analysis, was drawn by me because the image provided by the program did not coincide with the analysis made by it.

In the first post I incorrectly listed it for Variable 1, but I made the necessary correction later.