" Jurnalul unui psiholog "( 2007-2025) este o viziune si o perspectiva originala asupra societatii romanesti generata initial de involutia unui domeniu profesional sensibil confiscat de instante straine naturii acestuia.
Este elita formata din acele personalitati de exceptie si independente fata de sistemul de aici , dar care cunosc si inteleg Romania si problemele ei , sau chiar cunosc limba romana , inteleg spiritualitatea romaneasca si in mod dezinteresat , onest si responsabil fac pentru Romania poate mai mult decat reprezentatii ei formali si elitele ei oficiale :
When the foundations of human morality (Jonathan Haidt) are questioned and individuals no longer feel shame, disgust, repulsion, nausea, fear, horror, they have already entered the realm of major pathology, and crime, violence, and criminality are waiting at the door.
This is a historical document, Putin's most important interview that shows that he knows exactly what he did, what he is doing, and is fully responsible for his acts and deeds, so he qualifies 💯 for the Hague tribunal and Russia's Nuremberg Trial 2.0.
LinkedIn is a special social network in that a large part of its members are real, civilized, educated and trained people who respect the rules of civilized dialogue (we exclude from the start influencers, diversionists, harassers, extremists, trolls, bots and fake accounts which unfortunately exist here too). Members who matter have a certain identity and a visible social route and favor real dialogue (a dialogue between two pseudonyms on the Internet without a face and without a name is absurd by definition). Finally, LinkedIn is a credible social network where people from any country can be up to date with real news from the most diverse fields respecting the rules of communication, dialogue and civilized polemics and can freely exchange opinions about the course of the world, politics, societies, culture, the international community and humanity (misinformation, diversions and fake news are taxed almost immediately).
Maybe I'm overly optimistic, but I think this social network is the equivalent of the UN for civilized people in any country because it is the only platform that can play this role (the European Union should have created an equivalent, but it didn't). The potential of this network is immense through the huge number of members already registered and through the social network generation algorithm:
Registered Members (Total): Over 1.3 billion.
Monthly Active Users: Over 310 million people actively use the platform each month.
In this context, the big problem of our world is the huge divide between citizens and those who represent them at the level of their country (politicians, government, state) and at the level of the international community (UN, international institutions and organizations).
The situation is repeated periodically at the global level. Between the aspirations of the people and the actions of politicians and global institutions, there is a gap that persists and even deepens continuously.
The scene is already a classic one. Millions of people can demonstrate in the streets against a tiny group of politicians hidden behind governments, parliaments and bureaucracy, and globally behind international institutions and organizations that do not respect their own rules of operation.
Essentially, politicians, states, governments, parliaments, institutions and international organizations proclaim the need for laws and norms on which their existence is based and which they should respect, but which they violate (UN Charter, etc.), and ordinary citizens are the only ones who pay the price for violating them, sometimes with their lives.
Finally, the second major problem of the contemporary world is the changing relationship between real space and virtual space.
The world has long become a global village in which processes, actions, tensions and wars in real space are becoming increasingly interconnected (the butterfly effect), more visible and are rapidly moving into virtual space where most decisions are already made, and the foundations of human morality are becoming optional.
The question is whether countries, societies, civilizations and the world as a whole choose the path of civilization and humanization and respect for the values of civilization and humanity or whether they enter the spiral of decivilization and dehumanization.
A simple citizen who respects the laws and norms of any civilized country cannot even get a job as a janitor at a school if he has a criminal record, but if he has criminal convictions, he can become mayor, parliamentarian, minister, or president.
The paradox that gives us chills is that the fate of entire communities, countries, continents and the entire world depends on the sneezes and whims of some people who often have a hat that is too big for their head, and this is an anomaly of history that must be resolved in the interest of humanity.
People are not equal among themselves (fortunately), but laws must be respected by everyone, not just by some.
Ultimately, beyond politicians, states, governments, parliaments, institutions and international organizations, there is a silent majority at a global level that respects the political, legal, economic, social, cultural, religious and moral norms of their countries and through whose efforts all governments, states and international institutions function. This silent majority does not have the right to decide, but it does or should have the right to an opinion.
In this case, we are faced with a unique situation. We know what politicians, states, governments, parliaments, institutions and international organizations want and do because they tell us so every day, but we do not know what the 300 million people who are active on LinkedIn every month want and what their aspirations are, not to mention the 500 million or even more who also have an opinion that can matter.
The challenge is fascinating. A huge human community respects the values of civilization, humanity and the foundations of human morality exists and awaits a way to manifest itself, unlike the politicians who have already provoked two world wars and laid the foundation for a third.
LinkedIn este o retea sociala aparte prin faptul ca o mare parte dintre membrii ei sunt persoane reale , civilizate, educate si instruite care respecta regulile dialogului civilizat ( excludem din start agentii de influenta , diversionistii, hartuitorii, extremistii, trolii, botii si conturile false care din nefericire exista si aici ). Membrii care conteaza au o identitate certa si o ruta sociala vizibila si favorizeaza dialogul real ( un dialog intre doua pseudonime pe Internet fara chip si fara nume este absurd prin definitie ). In sfarsit , LinkedIn este o retea sociala credibila unde oamenii din orice tara pot fi la curent cu stiri reale din cele mai diverse domenii respectand regulile comunicarii, dialogului si polemicii civilizate si pot schimba liber opinii despre mersul lumii, politicii, societatilor , culturii , comunitatii internationale si umanitatii ( dezinformarile , diversiunile si stirile false sunt taxate aproape imediat ).
Poate sunt exagerat de optimist, dar consider ca aceasta retea sociala este echivalentul ONU pentru oamenii civilizati din orice tara pentru ca este singura platforma care poate juca acest rol ( Uniunea Europeana ar fi trebuit sa creeze un echivalent , dar nu a facut-o ). Potentialul acestei retele este imens prin prin numarul imens de membrii inregistrati deja si prin algoritmul de generare al retelelor sociale :
Membri Înregistrați (Total): Peste 1,3 miliarde.
Utilizatori Activi Lunar : Peste 310 milioane de persoane utilizează activ platforma în fiecare lună.
In acest context, marea problema a lumii noastre este fractura uriasa dintre cetateni si cei care ii reprezinta la nivelul tarii lor ( politicienii , guvernul, statul ) respectiv la nivelul comunitatii internationale ( ONU , institutiile si organizatiile internationale ).
Situatia se repeta periodic la nivel global. Intre aspiratiile oamenilor si actiunile politicienilor si institutiilor globale exista un decalaj care persista si chiar se adanceste in mod continuu.
Scena este deja una clasica . Milioane de oameni pot manifesta in strada impotriva unui grup minuscul de politicieni ascunsi in spatele guvernelor , parlamentelor si birocratiei , iar la nivel global in spatele institutiilor si organizatiilor internationale care nu-si respecta propriile norme de functionare.
In esenta, politicienii ,statele , guvernele, parlamentele , institutiile si organizatiile internationale clameaza necesitatea unor legi si norme pe care isi bazeaza existenta si pe care ar trebui sa le respecte , dar pe care le incalca ( Carta ONU , etc. ) , iar cetatenii obisnuiti sunt singurii care platesc pretul pentru incalcarea lor, uneori cu viata.
In sfarsit , a doua mare problema a lumii contemporane este schimbarea raportului dintre spatiul real si spatiul virtual .
Lumea a devenit de multa vreme un sat global in care procesele , actiunile , tensiunile si razboaiele din spatiul real devin din ce in ce mai interconectate ( efectul fluture ) , mai vizibile si se muta accelerat in spatiul virtual unde se iau deja cele mai multe decizii ,iar fundamentele moralei umane devin optionale.
Intrebarea este daca tarile, societatiile , civilizatiile si lumea in ansamblu aleg calea civilizarii si umanizarii si respectarea valorilor civilizatiei si umanitatii sau se inscriu in spirala decivilizarii si dezumanizarii .
Un simplu cetatean care respecta legile si normele din orice tara civilizata nu se poate angaja nici portar la o scoala daca are cazier juridic, dar daca are condamnari penale poate ajunge primar, parlamentar, ministru sau presedinte .
Paradoxul care ne da fiori este acela ca soarta unor intregi comunitati, tari , continente si a intregii lumi depinde de stranutul si mofturile unor persoane care de multe ori au o palarie mult prea mare pentru capul lor si aceasta este o anomalie a istoriei care trebuie rezolvata in interesul umanitatii .
Oamenii nu sunt egali intre ei (din fericire ), dar legile trebuie respectate de catre toti , nu numai de catre unii.
In ultima instanta , dincolo de politicieni,state , guverne, parlamente , institutii si organizatii internationale exista o majoritate tacuta la nivel global care respecta normele politice ,juridice, economice, sociale, culturale , religioase si morale din tarile lor si prin efortul careia functioneaza toate guvernele , statele si institutiile internationale . Aceasta majoritate tacuta nu are drept de decizie , dar are sau ar trebui sa aiba dreptul la opinie.
In acest caz ne aflam in fata unei situatii inedite. Stim ce vor si ce fac politicienii,statele , guvernele, parlamentele , institutiile si organizatiile internationale pentru ca ne spun asta in fiecare zi, dar nu stim ce vor si ce aspiratii au cele 300 de milioane de oameni care sunt activi in fiecare luna pe LinkedIn ca sa nu ne gandim la 500 de milioane sau chiar mai mult care au si ei o opinie care poate conta.
Provocarea este fascinanta. O imensa comunitate umana respecta valorile civilizatiei , umanitatii si fundamentele moralei umane exista si asteapta o cale de manifestare spre deosebire de politicienii care au provocat deja doua razboaie mondiale si au pus temelia celui de-al treilea.
