The spiral of decivilization and dehumanization of the contemporary world
Currently, the international community is witnessing live and passively everything that was previously avoided and later presented in a stylized form, starting with aggressions, attacks, invasions, wars, war crimes, atrocities, tortures, etc. and going up to genocide. The new rule, in fact a fierce competition, is that all of this be captured and presented “live” (“these facts can affect you emotionally”).
Underneath this catastrophe that has engulfed the entire international media space, a much more tragic one against innocence is silently unfolding, namely a crusade against the most fragile earthly beings, children.
7 years ago, the American conservative author Judith Reisman (since deceased), known for her criticism of the work and legacy of modern sexologist Alfred Kinsey, gave an interview to a Romanian newspaper. This interview remains a reference for comparing two diametrically opposed perspectives on the spiral of decivilization and dehumanization of contemporary civilization.
The soul, human feelings and their purest expression, children, have taken a back seat to desensitization, the exacerbation of instincts and the offensive of pornography and obscenity.
The interview is a plea for a return to decency, sensitivity, feelings and humanity.
 |
| Judith Reisman |
Reisman is a professor at Liberty University, the largest Christian university in the United States. Prof. Reisman's studies focused on dismantling the "work" of the father of modern sexology, Alfred Kinsey, who scientifically legitimized the postwar sexual chaos.
These studies exposed the massive fraud that underpinned Kinsey's research, as well as the sexual abuse of minors included in the studies. Kinsey's research – a pedophile and a controversial bisexual for whom there is only one sexual abnormality, abstinence – was the cornerstone of LGBTQ ideology and agenda. Important decisions were made based on it, which changed the face of American society, the most recent being, without a doubt, the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Kinsey's influence also spilled over into American popular culture, with successful pornographic magazines, as well as feminist magazines like "Cosmopolitan," being the result of Kinsey's revolution. As Dr. Judith Reisman states in an exclusive interview with "România liberă," the cultural war sparked by these illegitimate and immoral sexual studies aims to destroy the traditional family, an institution older and more important than any Constitution in the world.
RL: What's wrong with gay "marriages"? What's the difference between gay and straight "marriages"?
Dr. Judith Reisman: The study you received about comparing straight and gay people looks at the characteristics that distinguish straight people from gay people and what they are interested in in a partner. Interest in partners who have any kind of long-term connection is virtually nonexistent, as you can see in the table.
What are the cultural, political, and social consequences of legalizing gay marriage? What can you tell us from your experience in America?
Typically, a homosexual has experienced traumatic events in his past; in the case of women, this was often incest; in the case of men, this may be older men who usually abused the victim when he was a child or teenager. Subsequently, the homosexual spends much of his adolescence and adulthood searching for answers within himself and relying, as a young man, on his attractiveness to win “friends” (we are referring to men in this discussion). Unfortunately, the victim no longer enjoys sexual acceptance after he leaves adolescence and loses his youthful appearance. So he will do what women so often do: he will engage in a lifelong campaign to gain acceptance, with his peers and in society. For society, this involves claiming the “right” to marriage, for which he has limited or no capacity. All of this cannot be solved, neither in the case of men nor in the case of women, as long as they continue on the same sterile and sexually dangerous path (diseases, violence).
Now the biggest problem is the mass recruitment in schools, because of course this has changed the nature of the problem. Textbooks, movies, novels, courses and especially the depraved sex education are certainly designed to get more and more children to adopt a homosexual transgender lifestyle. This brings the young man into a larger group and then he becomes part of a massive political structure. We have seen what happens in churches. When homosexuals dominate an organization, there is always the possibility of blackmail, which puts them in a position to control the institutions. Although being homosexual is not such a big problem anymore, the violence and promiscuity associated with this lifestyle is a major problem.
What are the origins of this latest trend in the sexual revolution?
As I said above, the latest trend is the control of the school system, exercised by sexual revolutionaries, by perverted heterosexuals, by homosexuals, bisexuals, transgenders, etc. However, this revolution was planned and conceived over a period of four generations, so it is not so new. Since Kinsey, in 1948, the results we see today are the consequences of developments that began then. The change was started by Kinsey, who was homosexual, addicted to masturbation, a sadomasochist, as can be seen in his tables about children. Hugh Hefner, a virgin student at 22 (which was normal in those years, but unusual today), read Kinsey and became, in his own words, "an author of pamphlets about (his theories) Kinsey". Thus Kinsey's pernicious tendencies were spread to the public—indeed, masturbation to pornography was one of his earliest inclinations—and he later filmed himself, both alone and with his crew, and forced everyone to take part in his sadomasochistic activities. Kinsey died of trauma to his sexual organs from masturbation, orchitis, and probably venereal diseases contracted from his multiple male partners. This is the "scientist" from whom the world learned about sexual behavior! This is a depraved "scientist" who sought to change sexual laws to suit his needs and to absolve himself of his crimes.
What can we expect in the future from this front of the sexual revolution?
The attempt to lower the age of consent or eliminate it, as has already happened in France, is part of the agenda. You see, the destruction of children is the end game, the enslavement, the control of society, the complete destruction of Judeo-Christian civilization through laws – this is what is being pursued, without a doubt.
Not many people have heard of Kinsey (although Hollywood made a movie about him), but many people around the world, especially teenagers, read “Playboy” or “Cosmopolitan.” You have examined this important but little-known connection in your articles. Would you like to comment?
Yes, of course. The sexual activities recommended, promoted, depicted in images in “Cosmopolitan”, in “Playboy” prepare children to accept and often practice these activities. All this, along with depraved sex education and pornography (“Playboy” and “Cosmo”) – and pornography promotes promiscuity, bi/homosexuality. This, of course, will be the end of our civilization as we know it, which we fought so hard to build.
Do you see any connection between Alfred Kinsey and the members of the Frankfurt School, who also had a substantial academic, cultural, and social influence in the US?
Yes, of course. Kinsey became the formal leader of the Frankfurt School. In this school, everyone was an elite outsider. To destroy the country and the Western Judeo-Christian world, a white, bow-tie-wearing Anglo-Saxon American was needed. The Rockefeller Foundation found the right man in Alfred Kinsey. He could draft the “Sexual Offenses” section of the Model Penal Code published in 1955, while the elite postmodern German “escapees” could not have such influence until about 10-15 years later. Then, following in Kinsey’s footsteps, they could exert their destructive influence in our faculties. We saved them, and they betrayed us, abolishing our entire worldview.
Here in Romania, we are, fortunately, a little behind, but we can hear a lot of noise about transgenderism and how children can be insecure about their sexual identity. How do you explain this phenomenon?
As I said, it took four generations for the new postmodern sexuality to be imposed, and the teachers were trained by perverted and ignorant people. How can they provide any better teaching? They are learning what they have learned from those who came before them. When I was doing my research for “Child Images, Crime, and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler” (1986) at American University, the dean of the Department of Education said that he got rid of all the traditionalist teachers “because the old-style teachers know and will teach about the old American values.”
What are the consequences of this constant and aggressive exposure of children and adolescents to pornography and images with sexual content?
Everyone knows the consequences of such exposure, we see them all around us, people see them in their children and in themselves. It is a tragedy. But since the media has stopped presenting the truth and has started to prohibit any speech that tells the truth, people believe that they are the only ones who notice these things and, out of human weakness, deny what they know. But we all understand the consequences of promoting pornography and images with sexual content. We all hear about rape, abuse, divorce, people no longer know what a normal emotional and sexual experience means, imitating pornography is a real fact.
Is sex education a solution to teenagers' problems? Does sex education provide good preparation for life?
How funny! It took them about three generations (starting in the 1960s) to give our children a depraved sex education, and they will do even more. If we were to measure sex education by the yardstick of success, we can say that it has been successful – in destroying marriages, of women and men, in increasing the number of sexual assaults committed on children as well as adults, in developing old and new sexual diseases in massive numbers. If this is the measure of the success of depraved sex education, then they have been successful! If we want something even worse than that, let's give sex education to people who will continue to misguide our children, confuse them even more, and turn them into victims (see gender uncertainty). And everyone knows it.
What are “deviations from pornography laws”?
In the United States, for a long time, there have been laws protecting children from pornography (the “Harmful to Minors” laws, the Children’s Health Act). Pornography was also absolutely illegal, in any form. However, working behind the scenes, deviants have introduced into the law the possibility of an exemption for the police and doctors, since they work with the results in criminal cases. However, as I said, these unknown people have introduced legislation that allows obscene materials to be shown to children of any age in schools and libraries. Supposedly, this is allowed for educational purposes. Well, that’s how it is: they are educated by the obscene materials they see, hear, read, and are traumatized, perverted, and harmed by them.
Do you have any recommendations for those parents who want to raise healthy, good, and moral children?
Yes, I would say that parents need to be extremely active in the legislative, political and cultural spheres around them, seeking to influence any media content distributed to the public. They should be on school boards, be in the media, where they can determine the necessary changes, and they know what changes are needed, they should run for office promoting moral values. And if moral and correct principles are not taught in schools, they should take their children out of those schools. I don't know what the laws are in your country in this regard. Here, children can be taken out of schools and educated at home, although it is somewhat difficult. You have to be careful of social workers who often have another agenda (trained in the third generation). Children have been taken from their parents and placed in children's homes, while the parents are fighting in court to get their children back home. I think Germany is the worst in this regard. But it is not surprising.
What is the ultimate goal of the sexual revolution?
Of course, the annihilation of independent thought, which means a nation enslaved by technology, which naturally contributes to this enslavement. Because we have not learned history, or we have been taught an insufficient or false history, as is the case with us. Immersion in a world of movies, computers, social networks, etc., what is called "bread and circuses". [This world] is here. We see it. We know it. We deny it. It is difficult to face these things. Of course, it is not known, but this is the reason why it is desired to get rid of the Church and any kind of religious system. Belief in God gives man a greater power to oppose. Religion practiced seriously is a huge obstacle to the Brave New World.
Ninel Ganea
Free Romania
03/10/2018
Source : https://romanialibera.ro/la-zi/judith-reisman-intelegeti-distrugerea-copiilor-este-sfarsitul-jocului-755156/
These studies exposed the massive fraud that underpinned Kinsey's research, as well as the sexual abuse of minors included in the studies. Kinsey's research – a pedophile and a controversial bisexual for whom there is only one sexual abnormality, abstinence – was the cornerstone of LGBTQ ideology and agenda. Important decisions were made based on it, which changed the face of American society, the most recent being, without a doubt, the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Kinsey's influence also spilled over into American popular culture, with successful pornographic magazines, as well as feminist magazines like "Cosmopolitan," being the result of Kinsey's revolution. As Dr. Judith Reisman states in an exclusive interview with "România liberă," the cultural war sparked by these illegitimate and immoral sexual studies aims to destroy the traditional family, an institution older and more important than any Constitution in the world.
RL: What's wrong with gay "marriages"? What's the difference between gay and straight "marriages"?
Dr. Judith Reisman: The study you received about comparing straight and gay people looks at the characteristics that distinguish straight people from gay people and what they are interested in in a partner. Interest in partners who have any kind of long-term connection is virtually nonexistent, as you can see in the table.
What are the cultural, political, and social consequences of legalizing gay marriage? What can you tell us from your experience in America?
Typically, a homosexual has experienced traumatic events in his past; in the case of women, this was often incest; in the case of men, this may be older men who usually abused the victim when he was a child or teenager. Subsequently, the homosexual spends much of his adolescence and adulthood searching for answers within himself and relying, as a young man, on his attractiveness to win “friends” (we are referring to men in this discussion). Unfortunately, the victim no longer enjoys sexual acceptance after he leaves adolescence and loses his youthful appearance. So he will do what women so often do: he will engage in a lifelong campaign to gain acceptance, with his peers and in society. For society, this involves claiming the “right” to marriage, for which he has limited or no capacity. All of this cannot be solved, neither in the case of men nor in the case of women, as long as they continue on the same sterile and sexually dangerous path (diseases, violence).
Now the biggest problem is the mass recruitment in schools, because of course this has changed the nature of the problem. Textbooks, movies, novels, courses and especially the depraved sex education are certainly designed to get more and more children to adopt a homosexual transgender lifestyle. This brings the young man into a larger group and then he becomes part of a massive political structure. We have seen what happens in churches. When homosexuals dominate an organization, there is always the possibility of blackmail, which puts them in a position to control the institutions. Although being homosexual is not such a big problem anymore, the violence and promiscuity associated with this lifestyle is a major problem.
What are the origins of this latest trend in the sexual revolution?
As I said above, the latest trend is the control of the school system, exercised by sexual revolutionaries, by perverted heterosexuals, by homosexuals, bisexuals, transgenders, etc. However, this revolution was planned and conceived over a period of four generations, so it is not so new. Since Kinsey, in 1948, the results we see today are the consequences of developments that began then. The change was started by Kinsey, who was homosexual, addicted to masturbation, a sadomasochist, as can be seen in his tables about children. Hugh Hefner, a virgin student at 22 (which was normal in those years, but unusual today), read Kinsey and became, in his own words, "an author of pamphlets about (his theories) Kinsey". Thus Kinsey's pernicious tendencies were spread to the public—indeed, masturbation to pornography was one of his earliest inclinations—and he later filmed himself, both alone and with his crew, and forced everyone to take part in his sadomasochistic activities. Kinsey died of trauma to his sexual organs from masturbation, orchitis, and probably venereal diseases contracted from his multiple male partners. This is the "scientist" from whom the world learned about sexual behavior! This is a depraved "scientist" who sought to change sexual laws to suit his needs and to absolve himself of his crimes.
What can we expect in the future from this front of the sexual revolution?
The attempt to lower the age of consent or eliminate it, as has already happened in France, is part of the agenda. You see, the destruction of children is the end game, the enslavement, the control of society, the complete destruction of Judeo-Christian civilization through laws – this is what is being pursued, without a doubt.
Not many people have heard of Kinsey (although Hollywood made a movie about him), but many people around the world, especially teenagers, read “Playboy” or “Cosmopolitan.” You have examined this important but little-known connection in your articles. Would you like to comment?
Yes, of course. The sexual activities recommended, promoted, depicted in images in “Cosmopolitan”, in “Playboy” prepare children to accept and often practice these activities. All this, along with depraved sex education and pornography (“Playboy” and “Cosmo”) – and pornography promotes promiscuity, bi/homosexuality. This, of course, will be the end of our civilization as we know it, which we fought so hard to build.
Do you see any connection between Alfred Kinsey and the members of the Frankfurt School, who also had a substantial academic, cultural, and social influence in the US?
Yes, of course. Kinsey became the formal leader of the Frankfurt School. In this school, everyone was an elite outsider. To destroy the country and the Western Judeo-Christian world, a white, bow-tie-wearing Anglo-Saxon American was needed. The Rockefeller Foundation found the right man in Alfred Kinsey. He could draft the “Sexual Offenses” section of the Model Penal Code published in 1955, while the elite postmodern German “escapees” could not have such influence until about 10-15 years later. Then, following in Kinsey’s footsteps, they could exert their destructive influence in our faculties. We saved them, and they betrayed us, abolishing our entire worldview.
Here in Romania, we are, fortunately, a little behind, but we can hear a lot of noise about transgenderism and how children can be insecure about their sexual identity. How do you explain this phenomenon?
As I said, it took four generations for the new postmodern sexuality to be imposed, and the teachers were trained by perverted and ignorant people. How can they provide any better teaching? They are learning what they have learned from those who came before them. When I was doing my research for “Child Images, Crime, and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler” (1986) at American University, the dean of the Department of Education said that he got rid of all the traditionalist teachers “because the old-style teachers know and will teach about the old American values.”
What are the consequences of this constant and aggressive exposure of children and adolescents to pornography and images with sexual content?
Everyone knows the consequences of such exposure, we see them all around us, people see them in their children and in themselves. It is a tragedy. But since the media has stopped presenting the truth and has started to prohibit any speech that tells the truth, people believe that they are the only ones who notice these things and, out of human weakness, deny what they know. But we all understand the consequences of promoting pornography and images with sexual content. We all hear about rape, abuse, divorce, people no longer know what a normal emotional and sexual experience means, imitating pornography is a real fact.
Is sex education a solution to teenagers' problems? Does sex education provide good preparation for life?
How funny! It took them about three generations (starting in the 1960s) to give our children a depraved sex education, and they will do even more. If we were to measure sex education by the yardstick of success, we can say that it has been successful – in destroying marriages, of women and men, in increasing the number of sexual assaults committed on children as well as adults, in developing old and new sexual diseases in massive numbers. If this is the measure of the success of depraved sex education, then they have been successful! If we want something even worse than that, let's give sex education to people who will continue to misguide our children, confuse them even more, and turn them into victims (see gender uncertainty). And everyone knows it.
What are “deviations from pornography laws”?
In the United States, for a long time, there have been laws protecting children from pornography (the “Harmful to Minors” laws, the Children’s Health Act). Pornography was also absolutely illegal, in any form. However, working behind the scenes, deviants have introduced into the law the possibility of an exemption for the police and doctors, since they work with the results in criminal cases. However, as I said, these unknown people have introduced legislation that allows obscene materials to be shown to children of any age in schools and libraries. Supposedly, this is allowed for educational purposes. Well, that’s how it is: they are educated by the obscene materials they see, hear, read, and are traumatized, perverted, and harmed by them.
Do you have any recommendations for those parents who want to raise healthy, good, and moral children?
Yes, I would say that parents need to be extremely active in the legislative, political and cultural spheres around them, seeking to influence any media content distributed to the public. They should be on school boards, be in the media, where they can determine the necessary changes, and they know what changes are needed, they should run for office promoting moral values. And if moral and correct principles are not taught in schools, they should take their children out of those schools. I don't know what the laws are in your country in this regard. Here, children can be taken out of schools and educated at home, although it is somewhat difficult. You have to be careful of social workers who often have another agenda (trained in the third generation). Children have been taken from their parents and placed in children's homes, while the parents are fighting in court to get their children back home. I think Germany is the worst in this regard. But it is not surprising.
What is the ultimate goal of the sexual revolution?
Of course, the annihilation of independent thought, which means a nation enslaved by technology, which naturally contributes to this enslavement. Because we have not learned history, or we have been taught an insufficient or false history, as is the case with us. Immersion in a world of movies, computers, social networks, etc., what is called "bread and circuses". [This world] is here. We see it. We know it. We deny it. It is difficult to face these things. Of course, it is not known, but this is the reason why it is desired to get rid of the Church and any kind of religious system. Belief in God gives man a greater power to oppose. Religion practiced seriously is a huge obstacle to the Brave New World.
Ninel Ganea
Free Romania
03/10/2018
Source : https://romanialibera.ro/la-zi/judith-reisman-intelegeti-distrugerea-copiilor-este-sfarsitul-jocului-755156/
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu