🔍(AI) Evaluating US Leadership (2025) using the Rensis Likert Method (1967)
( President Donald Trump key figure )
The evolution of the USA has currently reached an inflection point generated by President Donald Trump, who has upset the value system of American society and openly intends to produce a categorical rupture with the previous evolution of this society of freedom, initiative and Western-style democracy.
The social fracture is evident in the abandonment of the values of transparency promoted by J.F. Kennedy, the values of political and social morality promoted by Ronald Reagan and the cynical return to the primitive imperialist model of past centuries.
His predecessors ( Biden, Obama, Clinton, etc. ) also had a significant role in America's decline, but Donald Trump has violated all the red lines by simultaneously resetting the status and position of the USA and, first of all, the international legal order, where he took over the baton from Russia and Putin, leaving them without an object of work.
Beyond the partisan political disputes and the strong emotions in the American public space, the evaluation of the US leadership under President Donald Trump is possible with the classical means offered by the social sciences offered by the Americans of the past. The 22 variables of human organization proposed by Rensis Lickert (1967) offer the possibility through AI/chatgbt to objectively evaluate the activity of this leadership, namely the SF catastrophe given to America by the impossible President Donald Trump.
1.Profile of the US leadership ( Donald Trump the key figure )
 |
2. Profile analysis
🔍 (AI)US Leadership Profile Analysis (2025)
Variables, states, characteristics
| No. | Organizational Variable | Estimated Status | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Degree of trust in subordinates | Blockage /🔴 Inefficient🟡 | Populism, extreme polarization |
2 | Managerial philosophy | Inefficient🟡 | Dominated by loyalty rather than competence |
3 | Reward policies | Inefficient🟡 | Political favoritism |
| 4 | Decision-making process | Blockage🔴 | Impulsive decisions, instability |
| 5 | Vertical communication | Inefficient🟡 | Distrust between leaders and institutions |
6 | Horizontal communication | Blockage🔴 | Internal divisions between agencies |
7 | Goal setting | Inefficient🟡 | Contradictory and incoherent objectives |
| 8 | Training and development | Blockage🔴 | Underfunding and lack of institutional interest |
| 9 | Interpersonal relationships | Inefficient🟡 | High tension and extreme polarization |
10 | Trust in leadership | Blockage🔴 | Trust only within ideological inner circles |
11 | Employee involvement | Inefficient🟡 | Low participation in administration |
12 | Internal motivation | Blockage🔴 | Undermining institutional morale |
13 | Job satisfaction | Inefficient🟡 | Burnout and bureaucratic conflict |
14 | Organizational cohesion | Blockage🔴 | Fragmented institutions |
15 | Adaptability to change | Inefficient🟡 | Resistance to reform and science |
16 | Role clarity | Inefficient🟡 | Confusion over responsibilities and hierarchy |
17 | Collective decision-making | Blockage🔴 | Authoritarian domination |
| 18 | Interdepartmental coordination | Blockage🔴 | Conflict between agencies |
19 | Attitude toward feedback | Blockage 🔴 | Hostility toward criticism |
20 | Innovation and creativity | Inefficient🟡 | Politically driven, not rational |
21 | Performance | Inefficient🟡 | Decline in democratic performance indicators |
22 | Use of control results | Blockage 🔴 | Institutional and legislative paralysis |
3. Instead of a conclusion
This leadership style boils down to:
"Is there anything left to destroy?"
Does anyone else see any future for the USA and President Donald Trump with this horror leadership style ?
You can place your bets now !
Note
The analysis of the variables, their status and evaluation was done by AI/chatgbt. The graph, respectively the graphical profile of the organization that resulted from this analysis, was drawn by me because the image provided by the program did not coincide with the analysis made by it.
In the first post I incorrectly listed it for Variable 1, but I made the necessary correction later.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu