Asociatia Americana de Psihologie regreta tortura

Asociatia Americana de Psihologie regreta tortura
Submitted by Dorin Victor Vasile on Mon, 06/22/2009 - 06:28


Asociatia Americana de Psihologie (APA) a publicat de curand o scrisoare deschisa in care isi exprima regretul pentru implicarea unor psihologi in activitatile de tortura ale regimului Bush impotriva opozantilor.

Nu, nu e vorba de politica ci doar de un raspuns la o presiune tot mai mare din partea publicului si membrilor asociatiei.

APA a fost confruntata in ultima vreme cu un val de demisii din partea unor psihologi de renume pe aceasta tema a "neimplicarii" asociatiei in ceea ce publicul larg din SUA considera a fi inacceptabil: implicarea psihologilor (membri ai asociatiei) in activitatile regimului, de la culegere de informatii pana la tortura.

E usor de inteles dezgustul publicului american pentru implicarea psihologilor in activitati care nu au de-a face cu psihologia, de la culegere de informatii pana la tortura. E un public care are oroare de relatii duale ( Smile..)Un psiholog e un psiholog iar un 'securist' (sau cum s-o chema la ei) e altceva, ar trebui sa fie persoane diferite.

Pot doar presupune ca publicul roman este ceva mai tolerant/indiferent la asta. Traind cu delatiunea in ograda inca de pe vremea fanariotilor, cu "APA" noastra dimensionata anume ca sa poata imbratisa toate activitatile extra-curiculare ale psihologilor nu cred ca pe la noi cineva s-ar scandaliza prea tare intr-o situatie similara. ( s.n.)

Pentru curiosi aceasta este scrisoarea APA:



June 18, 2009

An Open Letter from the Board of Directors

Dear Colleague,

As a psychologist and member of the American Psychological Association (APA), you no doubt share our serious concerns about reports regarding the involvement of psychologists in torture and abusive interrogations as part of the Bush administration’s “war on terror.” We recognize that the issue of psychologist involvement in national security-related investigations has been an extremely difficult and divisive one for our association. We also understand that some of our members continue to be disappointed and others angered by the association’s actions in this regard. Although APA has had a longstanding policy against psychologist involvement in torture, many members wanted the association to take a strong stand against any involvement of psychologists in national security interrogations during the Bush administration.

Information has emerged in the public record confirming that, as committed as some psychologists were to ensuring that interrogations were conducted in a safe and ethical manner, other psychologists were not. Although there are countless psychologists in the military and intelligence community who acted ethically and responsibly during the post-9/11 era, it is now clear that some psychologists did not abide by their ethical obligations to never engage in torture or other forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. The involvement of psychologists, no matter how small the number, in the torture of detainees is reprehensible and casts a shadow over our entire profession. APA expresses its profound regret that any psychologist has been involved in the abuse of detainees.

This has been a painful time for the association and one that offers an opportunity to reflect and learn from our experiences over the last five years. APA will continue to speak forcefully in further communicating our policies against torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment to our members, the Obama administration, Congress, and the general public. In so doing, we will continue to highlight our 2008 petition resolution policy, Psychologists and Unlawful Detention Settings with a Focus on National Security. APA will ensure that association communications convey clearly that the petition resolution is official association policy and must be central to psychologists’ assessment of the appropriateness of their roles in specific work settings related to national security. Our association’s governing body, the Council of Representatives, will soon be receiving guidance from various governance groups regarding further steps to implement this resolution. The history of APA positions and actions related to detainee welfare and professional ethics can be found at http://www.apa.org/releases/timeline.html.

On a closely related matter, the Ethics Committee and APA governance as a whole are focused intently on Ethics Code Standards 1.02 and 1.03, which address conflicts between ethics and law and between ethics and organizational demands, respectively. In light of Bush administration interrogation policies and uncertainty among our membership, the Ethics Committee has issued the attached statement, “No defense to torture under the APA Ethics Code” (http://www.apa.org/releases/ethicsstatement-torture.pdf ). Invoking language from the U.N. Convention Against Torture, this statement clarifies that the Ethics Committee “will not accept any defense to torture in its adjudication of ethics complaints.”

APA will continue to monitor material in official reports related to psychologist mistreatment of national security detainees, will investigate reports of unethical conduct by APA members, and will adjudicate cases in keeping with our Code of Ethics. The association’s focus on these ethical standards is consistent with its position that no psychologist involved in detainee abuse should escape accountability.

In conclusion, as part of APA’s elected leadership, we have an obligation to protect and further psychology’s longstanding commitment to the highest standards of professional ethics–including, and especially, the protection of human welfare.

Respectfully,

American Psychological Association 2009 Board of Directors James H. Bray, PhD Carol D. Goodheart, EdD Alan E. Kazdin, Ph.D.
Barry S. Anton, PhD
Paul L. Craig, PhD
Norman B. Anderson, PhD
Rosie Phillips Bingham, PhD
Jean A. Carter, PhD
Armand R. Cerbone, PhD
Suzanne Bennett Johnson, PhD
Melba J.T. Vasquez, PhD
Michael Wertheimer, PhD
Konjit V. Page, MS

(860)* Dorin Victor Vasile's blog * 119 reads

Sursa :
(http://www.psihoterapie.net/blog/dorin-victor-vasile/2009/06/asociatia-americana-de-psihologie-regreta-tortura.html)

http://www.psihoterapie.net/blog/dorin-victor-vasile/2009/06/asociatia-americana-de-psihologie-regreta-tortura.html




Comentariu


La noi nu exista in acest sens( in spatiul public vizibil cel putin - poate doar pe blog-uri si forum-uri ) o presiune vizibila din partea societatii cu atat mai mult din partea fantomaticei Asociatii a Psihologilor Romani ( care seamana doar cu numele cu cea americana ) cam ramasa fara obiect al muncii din cauza sacrosanctului Colegiu al Psihologilor din Romania desi amandoua au cam aceeasi membrii( sic ! ).
Dupa cum la noi e greu de inteles lipsa de reactie a societatii civile fata de o eventuala implicare a psihologilor in activitatile fostului regim, de la culegere de informatii pana la tortura.
Daca la americani "Un psiholog e un psiholog iar un 'securist' (sau cum s-o chema la ei) e altceva, ar trebui sa fie persoane diferite." , la noi e ca la noi...conform legii ! Care permite exact contrariul...
In sfarsit , nu pot fi de acord sub nici o forma cu aceasta presupunere care pledeaza pentru atrofierea simtului moral al romanilor chipurile datorita unor circumstante "atenuante" :

" Pot doar presupune ca publicul roman este ceva mai tolerant/indiferent la asta. Traind cu delatiunea in ograda inca de pe vremea fanariotilor, cu "APA" noastra dimensionata anume ca sa poata imbratisa toate activitatile extra-curiculare ale psihologilor nu cred ca pe la noi cineva s-ar scandaliza prea tare intr-o situatie similara. ".


Pai in primul rand ar trebui sa se scandalizeze oficial si in primul rand psihologii , psihoterapeutii si psihiatrii pentru ca nu o vor face niciodata pentru ei domnul Vanghelie, comisarul Piedone sau primarul din Poplaca ! Faptul ca nu o fac ( ati auzit vreodata de o luare de pozitie oficiala a profesionistilor acestor stiinte fata de aceste probleme ?) este problema lor chiar daca "prietenii stiu de ce " pentru ca lipsa de reactie in acest caz suna a acceptare ca sa nu spunem altfel.
Aici ma raliez lui Dan Puric care nu este nici psiholog , nici psihoterapeut , nici psihiatru dar gandeste ( unii ar spune "empiric" ) in sensul mentinerii unei normalitati sociale si nu in sensul destructurarii ei. Cu Don Quijote , deja suntem trei !